Consultants to Contact
- Allison Young - Vice President & Consulting Actuary (Dallas)
- Bonnie Albritton - Vice President & Principal (Dallas)
- Brian Rankin - Vice President & Principal (Washington, D.C.)
- Brian Stentz - Vice President & Principal (Dallas)
- Cabe Chadick - President & Managing Principal (Dallas)
- Chris Merkel - Senior Vice President & Principal (Kansas City)
- David Dillon - Senior Vice President & Principal (Dallas)
- Daniel Moore - Vice President & Senior Consulting Actuary (Dallas)
- David Palmer - Vice President & Principal (Baltimore)
- Glenn A. Tobleman - Executive Vice President & Principal (Dallas)
- Heather Robinson - Senior Consultant & Director - Underwriting (Kansas City)
- Jamie Fender - Vice President & Consulting Actuary (Dallas)
- Jason Dunavin - Vice President & Senior Consulting Actuary (Kansas City)
- Jeffrey D. Lee - Vice President & Consulting Actuary (Kansas City)
- Josh Hammerquist - Vice President & Principal (Dallas)
- Jing Qian - Vice President & Consulting Actuary (Dallas)
- Jacqueline Lee - Vice President & Principal (Dallas)
- Kevin Ruggeberg - Vice President & Senior Consulting Actuary (Dallas)
- Kim Shores - Vice President & Principal (Kansas City)
- Muhammed Gulen - Vice President & Legal Consultant (Dallas)
- Moshe Nelkin - Senior Consulting Actuary (Dallas)
- Mark Stukowski - Vice President & Principal (Denver)
- Patrick Glenn - Vice President & Principal (Kansas City)
- Robert Dorman - Vice President & Consulting Actuary (Dallas)
- Traci Hughes - Vice President & Senior Consulting Actuary (Dallas)
- Tom Roberts - Vice President & Consulting Actuary (Dallas)
- Vickie Goodman - Vice President & Director - Compliance (Kansas City)
Testimonial
Over the last several years, the amount of money people pay for their health insurance has been a major point of contention, and was in fact a big driver behind the passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Now, the state of New York wants to implement a new tax that would further increase those costs, and those in the health insurance industry have responded negatively to the plan as a consequence.
The office of New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo recently released its proposed executive budget for 2015-16, and included within it a tax on health insurance premiums, according to a report from the Albany Business Review. Though the tax would add less than $25 to the average person's health coverage premiums, and would be used to fund the continued operation of the state's health insurance exchange, it has nonetheless been criticized roundly for increasing coverage costs, at least among policy providers.
Bob Hinckley, chief strategy officer for the state's second-largest health insurer, told the publication that while the state is doing more to improve access to health care, it is simultaneously making it more expensive for residents to obtain it, the report said. This may be particularly burdensome for employers, however, who face the tough choice of either passing even a relatively small tax onto their workers, or covering it themselves and potentially racking up thousands of dollars in added costs annually. Furthermore, if the tax is implemented, it is conceivable that the tax rate could be increased in the future to generate higher revenue for the state, but higher health insurance premiums for its users.
What's at stake?
Experts also say that even if health care costs are increasing more slowly than they once did, they're still increasing at a rate which may be of concern to individuals and businesses alike, the report said. Some are concerned that these mounting costs could lead to large amounts of people nationwide losing their jobs, as companies of all sizes make hard decisions about how best to address these rising costs.
Meanwhile, Cuomo's proposed budget includes some other issues related to health care, the report said. For instance, the state would increase spending on Medicaid by 3.6 percent out of the state budget, and 5.6 percent overall (thanks to federal money).
Health insurance companies will need to keep a close eye on the ways in which various states react to the ins and outs of the ACA over the next several years, because many are still adjusting their operations to be more responsive to the issues the law creates.